Goner Message Board
 | Forums | Register | Reply | Search | Statistics | Manual |
Goner Message Board / ???? / Jay Reatard - Live in Vegas Video!
Posted: Dec 4, 2007 9:51 pm
 
"Blood Visions", "It's So Easy" and Jay kicking a dudes face in all clocking in at 2:33.

Chef Tard
Posted: Dec 6, 2007 3:21 pm
 
I'm slightly amazed no one commented on this.
Posted: Dec 6, 2007 3:48 pm
 
I'm slightly amazed no one commented on this.

Theories include:
1. What is unusual about this that would warrant discussion?
2. No one wanted to chime in and associate themselves with the "pseudo-undergroundness" of Sailor Jerry inc.

I do like that they/you are helping to spread the word about great bands though.
Posted: Dec 6, 2007 3:49 pm
 
Nice ending
Posted: Dec 6, 2007 3:50 pm
 
i still need to install the newest version of whateverfuckingprogram it is to be able to watch it, quickplayer or something. been too busy and i'm bummed cuz i wanna see Jay in the Double Down! Miss that place.


Wait, no I don't!
Posted: Dec 6, 2007 4:00 pm
 
here goes:

that is one lifeless crowd. the end looks like it was spliced in for effect.
Posted: Dec 6, 2007 4:47 pm
 
that is one lifeless crowd

Indeed. I think people were just kinda blown away?

BJ, we'll be adding to youtube soon.
Posted: Dec 6, 2007 5:01 pm
 
or maybe just really high on weeeeed?
Posted: Dec 6, 2007 5:12 pm
 
When I'm high on weed I'm all like woooob woooob wooooob woob.
Posted: Dec 6, 2007 5:16 pm
 
or maybe just really high on weeeeed?

Is that what that funny smell was? I thought it was Jay's balls.
Posted: Dec 6, 2007 5:28 pm
 
or maybe just really high on weeeeed?


The Double Down is a coke bar, not a weed bar. SHEESH!
Posted: Dec 6, 2007 5:34 pm
 
maybe not since you left!
Posted: Dec 6, 2007 5:53 pm
 
BURN!
Posted: Dec 6, 2007 6:15 pm
 
Posted: Dec 6, 2007 6:18 pm
 
Posted: Dec 6, 2007 6:27 pm
 
Your band sucks and plays too long.
Posted: Dec 6, 2007 6:31 pm
 
Posted: Dec 6, 2007 6:32 pm
 
You could join in but we demand that our members can read. Not music. Just read.
Posted: Dec 6, 2007 6:40 pm
 
Posted: Dec 6, 2007 7:31 pm
 
Hey Sissyfist, you're really funny. Wanna makeout?
Posted: Dec 6, 2007 8:17 pm
 
I'd prefer watching you all give each other reach arounds but thanks anyways. Your sister is kind of shy around strangers.
Posted: Dec 6, 2007 8:39 pm
 
Your band sucks and plays too long.
Posted: Dec 6, 2007 9:06 pm
 
I'd prefer watching you all give each other reach arounds but thanks anyways. Your sister is kind of shy around strangers.

As part-time Lurker around here, sir, I take offense at these statements.
Posted: Dec 7, 2007 4:53 pm
 
is sysyphus back?

hey what's all that fucking clicking in the goddamn Vegas video? Too distracting from some dude getting kicked in the face eventually.
Posted: Dec 7, 2007 5:09 pm
 
UGH! those drums sound like wet cardboard boxes
Posted: Dec 7, 2007 5:16 pm
 
UGH! those drums sound like wet cardboard boxes


That's Jay beating off to all the Memphis gay men he was looking for.
Posted: Dec 7, 2007 5:16 pm
 
UGH! those drums sound like wet cardboard boxes

Yea, the way the sound was.... it only picked up the attack for the video. It sucks.
Posted: Dec 7, 2007 5:17 pm
 
As part-time Lurker around here, sir, I take offense at these statements.


Sorry. I have never met your sister or I would have included her. I'd hate to hurt the feelings of someone named Crackhouse.
Posted: Dec 7, 2007 5:34 pm
 
Your band sucks and you play too long.
Posted: Dec 7, 2007 6:03 pm
 
fucking clicking
kick drum

GFIV set still hasn't left my truck.
Posted: Dec 7, 2007 6:10 pm | Edited by: dustymedical
 
I'd prefer watching you all give each other reach arounds

sounds kinda gay!
Posted: Dec 7, 2007 6:20 pm
 
I'd prefer watching you all give each other reach arounds

sounds kinda gay!



Figure someone here would get it. Or get it.
Posted: Dec 7, 2007 6:23 pm
 
I don't get it...must mean that I'm straight!
hooray!
Posted: Dec 7, 2007 6:25 pm
 
I don't get it...must mean that I'm straight!
hooray!


cococoma is coming on the top of this thread
Posted: Dec 7, 2007 6:35 pm
 
Figure someone here would get it.

You can spend your nights thinking of a bunch of snappy put-downs and then come on here and pretend that you're too cool to care about Jay Rea-UH-tard, but it's quite obvious that you care a lot. But hold on...are you really trying to convince people that you're not some clueless faggot in some shitty Idaho band that plays too long? I think you need to reevaluate your strategy, fella.
Posted: Dec 7, 2007 6:36 pm
 
RUBY RIDGE!!!!
Posted: Dec 7, 2007 6:51 pm
 
I thought it was Jay's balls.

Jay's balls smell like nutella
Posted: Dec 7, 2007 7:46 pm | Edited by: a cobb
 
I liked those videos from earlier, sysyphus. We should get back on that topic instead of talking about gay dudes and balls and shit.

here's you.

BURN!
Posted: Dec 7, 2007 7:52 pm | Edited by: Sysyphus
 
pretend that you're too cool to care about Jay Rea-UH-tard,


I never said I did not care. I do not like. You guys have dictionaries? So if I care, I'm cool. Hooray!

you're not some clueless faggot in some shitty Idaho band that plays too long?
Too long? Too Long? Wait a minute, I've heard that before. Right. Three times already here in one thread. The monotony and plagiarism and repetition is killing me. Sort of like you know whose music!


BURN!
Posted: Dec 7, 2007 7:52 pm
 
I thought it was Jay's balls.

Jay's balls smell like nutella

Remind me to skip your family dinners.
Posted: Dec 7, 2007 7:54 pm
 
I like the dressy/casual tuxedo shirt. I love it when people have "stage clothes"... really says "Yeah, I'm up here "performing" or whatever, but it's cool, I don't button the cuffs or anything."
Posted: Dec 7, 2007 8:14 pm
 
It's cool not to like Jay now that he's on Matador and in Spin!
Posted: Dec 7, 2007 8:18 pm
 
I like the dressy/casual tuxedo shirt.


My punk rock clothes were at the cleaner's. Something about that they had to import spittle and pizza bits to make them authentic. Damn!
Posted: Dec 7, 2007 8:35 pm
 
are you dane cook? because you're HELLA FUNNY
Posted: Dec 7, 2007 10:03 pm
 
That wasn't a joke, duh!
Posted: Dec 7, 2007 10:07 pm
 
My punk rock clothes were at the cleaner's. Something about that they had to import spittle and pizza bits to make them authentic. Damn!


it gets more & more embarassing by the second...

& I think your earlier post should have read "you know who's", not "you know whose"... ya know grammar & stuff...(since you insist that people know how to read before they're "allowed" to talk at you)...
Posted: Dec 8, 2007 12:16 am
 
Hey Sysyphus.. give us a link to your band's myspace again. I'm too lazy to find it in a different thread.
Posted: Dec 8, 2007 12:32 am
 
URL
\
Sorry about pronoun error. I slapped my wife and beat my kids as penance.

Who is Dana Cook? Seriously.
Posted: Dec 8, 2007 12:36 am
 
URL
\
Sorry about pronoun error. I slapped my wife and beat my kids as penance.


That's all I had to wait for.
Sysyphus is michael baker with yet another sock puppet.
The real boise boy was Sisyphus.
Posted: Dec 8, 2007 1:15 pm
 
Sysyphus is michael baker with yet another sock puppet.


Who?

& I think your earlier post should have read "you know who's", not "you know whose"..
Nope.

Possessive pronoun. My nuns beat that into me.
I apologize to my wife, countrymen, and EB White for thinking I was wrong without checking.
Posted: Dec 8, 2007 5:26 pm
 
i think you're wrong
Posted: Dec 9, 2007 4:26 am
 
I think Sysy gets google alerts for Jay Reatard.
Posted: Dec 9, 2007 5:22 am
 
I think Sysy gets google alerts for Jay Reatard.

I think I still haven't recieved a free bottle of rum.
Posted: Dec 9, 2007 12:55 pm
 
Sort of like you know whose music!
no Sissy is right.

if who's then you need to sub who is

Sort of like you know who is music!

yikes


and jack is drinking again
i don't eat potatoes
Posted: Dec 10, 2007 6:19 pm
 
i still think bill is right.
Posted: Dec 10, 2007 6:23 pm
 
i like football players, whose mud stained uniforms make me hard.

Guess who's coming to dinner?

Who's going to eat those potatoes?

Jay's friends are cool, but whose cars resemble death traps and retarded minivans.
Posted: Dec 10, 2007 6:43 pm
 
you're subsituting "you-know-who" for "jay" so would it be Jayse music or Jay's music? i still think bill is right.

GRAMMAR PUNK!
Posted: Dec 10, 2007 6:46 pm | Edited by: LisaLisa
 
well, sadly, I think Sys might be right... he wasn't saying "you know
who is music" cuz that is what translates to who's in contraction form...
Posted: Dec 10, 2007 6:48 pm
 
Michael Baker should be the final vote.
Posted: Dec 10, 2007 7:01 pm
 
you're subsituting "you-know-who" for "jay" so would it be Jayse music or Jay's music? i still think bill is right.
you cannot subsitute a pronoun (whose) for jay because jay is not in sentence; Jay's is, making it not a noun but rather a possessive. anyways clearly whose refers to the immediately preceding plural noun collection (friends)

the following sentence is wrong

Dusty's courage was such that he was awarded a a Prix de Guerre from the thankful French.

besides that the french ever being thankful for anything except the cure for clap. HE is wrong--once again a pronoun cannot refer to a possessive. the courage was awarded, not dusty. please substitute IT for HE
Posted: Dec 10, 2007 7:04 pm
 
Fuck you all. I'm getting my Strunk and White.
Posted: Dec 10, 2007 7:07 pm
 
more rules

My father, as do the other 60 million Indians in Harlem, has a mohawk.

The group of the hundreds of Goner Board Members has really turned on Ned.


Neither Ned's two friends nor Ned's rotting corpse is coming over for dinner.
Posted: Dec 10, 2007 7:32 pm
 
Page one of Strunk and White defends the use of apostrophes for indefinite pronomial possessives.

one's rights
somebody else's umbrella.


I hate writers.
Posted: Dec 10, 2007 8:32 pm
 
not to stir it up...but doesn't the whole phrase "you know who" take the place of said person's name without actually saying their name? So (for example) when you're saying "Sort of like you know who's music!" you are (in essence) saying "Sort of like Jay Reatard's music!"...

just sayin'...
Posted: Dec 10, 2007 8:53 pm | Edited by: LisaLisa
 
Well, the accepted possessive form of who is whose but that doesn't change the shotty English and fragmented sentences.
Posted: Dec 10, 2007 9:00 pm
 
I shouldn't talk...message boards have reverted my grammar to a 3rd grade level.
Posted: Dec 10, 2007 9:01 pm
 
Guess who's coming to dinner?


Sidney Poitier?
Posted: Dec 10, 2007 9:04 pm
 
THEY CALL HIM MR. TIBBS!
Posted: Dec 10, 2007 9:50 pm
 
here's what my book-nerd ex-girlfriend has to say about it

i asked her:

"The monotony and plagiarism and repetition is killing me. Sort of like you know whose music!"

"The monotony and plagiarism and repetition is killing me. Sort of like you know who's music!"

"you-know-who" refers to a guy, of course.

which is correct?

I think the second one, but only if "you-know-who's" has the dashes between the words. Because "who" is a stand in for a name in this case. Or the whole phrase is, really,so it would be like saying "...Sort of like Bill's music" but instead you're using the phrase.

Whose is the possessive of who, ("Bill, whose repetitive music is killing me.") but since you're using a stand-in for a name that doesn't happen to apply here.

I think that's how it goes.
Posted: Dec 10, 2007 10:26 pm
 
It's "you know who's" music. It's also "shoddy."
Posted: Dec 10, 2007 10:31 pm
 
you know who's

I thought to relay the possessive it would be "you know whos'" music? Not "you know who is" music... which is implied by the apsotrophe in between the o and the s... I dunno if I am right or not, but that is what I always thought.
Posted: Dec 10, 2007 10:41 pm
 
whose cares?
Posted: Dec 10, 2007 10:56 pm
 
"you-know-who" is a substitute for "Jay". case closed. you're all nerds.
Posted: Dec 11, 2007 12:44 am
 
you're all nerds.

True dat!
Posted: Dec 11, 2007 12:50 am
 
The Who's music

All of the Whos in Whoville had their hoo-hoos stolen by the Ginch. Whose hoo-hoos? The Who's.
Posted: Dec 11, 2007 3:20 am
 

"The monotony and plagiarism and repetition is killing me. Sort of like you know who's music!"



good thing you broke up with her


who's has to be rendered who is

thus capsizing the logic and grammar of that sentence
Posted: Dec 11, 2007 3:25 am
 
Page one of Strunk and White defends the use of apostrophes for indefinite pronomial possessives.

one's rights
somebody else's umbrella.

I hate writers.



yes never said otherwise

but who's is not on that list

who's means who is


one's rights
somebody else's umbrella.


of course, but i never said a pronoun cannot possess, even singular, indefinite ones

in fact it i\s inesacaple

one's relationship to grammar is the embodiment of one's relationship to civilization

actually there is NO other way of saying it

(if using one as indefinite subjective pronoun)
Posted: Dec 11, 2007 3:25 am
 
naw the apostrophe shows ownership like frank's red hot. duh.
Posted: Dec 11, 2007 3:27 am
 
one's relationship to grammar is the embodiment of one's relationship to civilization

I hate philosophers even more.
Posted: Dec 11, 2007 3:28 am
 
"you know who" is a nickname or substitute for a name so the possessive usage applies.
Posted: Dec 11, 2007 3:32 am
 
Posted: Dec 11, 2007 3:33 am
 
i have a pizza
Posted: Dec 11, 2007 3:35 am
 
I would like a slice of himself's pizza.

there, its a pronoun and a name. just like "you know who"
Posted: Dec 11, 2007 3:36 am
 
sup?
Posted: Dec 11, 2007 3:36 am | Edited by: you know who
 
Posted: Dec 11, 2007 3:37 am
 
what you got to say now, writer man???
Posted: Dec 11, 2007 3:46 am
 
what you got to say now, writer man???


that it means who is next

you can't OWN next

what do i care: it's only the third best who album, WHOSE other records in the 60's i like better
Posted: Dec 11, 2007 3:48 am
 
You have no appreciation for Dr. Seuss.
Posted: Dec 11, 2007 3:48 am
 
no it means who's next, who is next would be a question, moron. its who's next, as in who's next record. if they were "the who" it would be the who's next record. are you fucking retarded?
Posted: Dec 11, 2007 3:52 am
 
they were "the who" it would be the who's next record.
duh

you mean like if it were the animals and it said animals' next record?

are you saying that if i said who is next that i also could not say who's next?

who is not a pronoun in who's next. it's a name of a band. we call that a noun up north.

what's up with the retard? the anger?
Posted: Dec 11, 2007 3:53 am
 
baker is basing his opinion on the assumption that the who and the whos in whoville are proper nouns.

ARTISTS BRINGING DOWN YOUR ANTIQUATED SYSTEM, BRAH!
Posted: Dec 11, 2007 3:54 am
 
you know who is a person. i rest my case.
Posted: Dec 11, 2007 3:55 am
 
retard.
Posted: Dec 11, 2007 3:55 am
 
the who IS a proper noun!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted: Dec 11, 2007 3:55 am
 
Posted: Dec 11, 2007 3:57 am
 
you know who is a person. i rest my case.


you just said it was band


some case
Posted: Dec 11, 2007 3:57 am
 
Check out you know who's profile.
http://www.goner-records.com/board/index.php?action=userinfo&user=8134
is the above sentence grammatically correct?
Posted: Dec 11, 2007 3:59 am
 
Posted: Dec 11, 2007 3:59 am | Edited by: dustymedical
 
"you-know-who" is slang and it's standing in for a person's name, so your fancy rules don't apply.

you-know-who's
you-know-who's
you-know-who's
you-know-who's
Posted: Dec 11, 2007 3:59 am
 
the who IS a proper noun!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

According to you, Institutionalist!
HOW'S THAT FOR A PROPER NOUN? WE'RE BURNING DOWN YOUR WALLS, MAN!
Posted: Dec 11, 2007 4:00 am
 
god bill look what you started.
Posted: Dec 11, 2007 4:01 am
 
I am very concerned by this discourse. Everyone back to their dorms. Nothing to see here.
Posted: Dec 11, 2007 4:03 am
 
LET YOUR FREAK FLAGS FLY, BROS! THIS IS IT!!! REVOLUTION!!! KILL THE PIGS!!!!
Posted: Dec 11, 2007 4:05 am
 
whoosiers
Posted: Dec 11, 2007 4:09 am
 
so whats the proper spelling of christssakes?
did i nail it or what? spell check tells me somethings not write...
Posted: Dec 11, 2007 4:09 am
 
fer chrisssakes
Posted: Dec 11, 2007 4:40 am | Edited by: deadcityrebel
 
did i nail it or what?

hee haw
Posted: Dec 11, 2007 5:16 am
 
the jews did.
Posted: Dec 11, 2007 2:06 pm
 
The Jew's did it? Losers. No wonder you love Jay's music. You can understand what he's saying.
Posted: Dec 11, 2007 2:16 pm
 
I prefer pussy to pronouns. And pizza. And my Pope. That German dude.
Posted: Dec 11, 2007 3:24 pm
 
In this case, "who" possesses "music," therefore "you know who's" music.
Posted: Dec 11, 2007 3:27 pm | Edited by: trickknee
 
The dashes are more "proper," but not necessary. Slang falls under the same basic rules of English as terms found in the Dictionary.
Posted: Dec 11, 2007 3:29 pm
 
In this case, "who" possesses "music," therefore "you know who's" music.


http://www.bris.ac.uk/arts/skills/grammar/grammar_tutorial/page_12.htm

jesus i quit. no dashes.
Posted: Dec 11, 2007 3:54 pm
 
todd's right
Posted: Dec 11, 2007 3:57 pm
 
you're too hung up on this "who is" "who has" thing... and it has nothing to do with "you-know-who"
Posted: Dec 11, 2007 4:15 pm
 
Right! Dusty rules!
Posted: Dec 12, 2007 12:27 am
 
For those that have trouble with quicktime.. here's the youtube video:
Posted: Dec 12, 2007 12:29 am
 
i still want a slice of himself's pizza.
Posted: Dec 12, 2007 12:30 am
 
thats my pizza, motherfucker.
Posted: Dec 12, 2007 12:37 am
 
fuck off, sissy puss
Posted: Dec 12, 2007 1:03 am
 
you're too hung up on this "who is" "who has" thing... and it has nothing to do with "you-know-who"
i am hung up on whether the pronoun is a subject or a possessive?

silly me.

http://www.englisch-hilfen.de/en/grammar/who_which.htm
Posted: Dec 12, 2007 1:12 am
 
Possessive Pronouns - are those which indicate...possession (see? Aren't I always telling you it's easy?)

MY car, YOUR house, OUR holiday, ITS kennel, THEIR decision, WHOSE job

Notice, please, that the expression who's is conspicuous by its absence - because it's a contraction of two words: who and is (or sometimes has). Use the same procedure here as you do when you find yourself on the horns of that other dilemma: its and it's. Substitute the words who is (or has) in the sentence and if it makes sense, then use who's. If not, whose is your man!

... Mumma Bear, who's apron partly hid him. (... Mumma Bear, who's [who is] apron partly hid him ... I don't think so ...)

... Mumma Bear, whose apron partly hid him. (She owns the apron ... look at the table and you'll see whose is a possessive pronoun.)
Posted: Dec 12, 2007 2:25 pm
 
You can't pull "who" from "you-know-who" and use it as transitory proof. There's no such phrase as "you know whose." The phrase is "you know who." Think of it as a single word.
Posted: Dec 12, 2007 2:44 pm
 
It isn't that fucking hard, people.

Who's ONLY exists as a contraction of the words "who" and "is."

The possessive of who is whose.

Always.

(see also "its" vs "it's")
Posted: Dec 12, 2007 2:46 pm
 
There's no such phrase as "you know whose."

Someone better tell the New York Times.
Posted: Dec 12, 2007 3:19 pm
 
the (who's next) record
you know, who's next record?
you know who's next record
Posted: Dec 12, 2007 3:39 pm
 
I just started reading this thread today, and now I want to kill myself.

YER ALL GAY!
Posted: Dec 12, 2007 4:15 pm | Edited by: JJ Champion
 
Can we at least agree that the real Sisyphus would've made mention of how many times you-know-whose Wikipedia page has been edited?
Posted: Dec 12, 2007 4:26 pm | Edited by: LisaLisa
 
CHECK THIS OUT TERMBO! LOOK WHO'S FIGHTING OVER GRAMMAR. THE GONER BOARD ARE SMART TWO!
Top
Your Reply Click this icon to move up to the quoted message
 

 
Only registered users are allowed to post here. Please, enter your username/password details upon posting a message, or register first.

 
  Goner Message Board Powered by PHP Forum Software miniBB ®