Posted: Dec 4, 2003 1:03 am
"Charging residents after the fact is behavior that makes the town look irresponsible."
This logic is astoundingly poor. Not such a good article. What do you do? Charge people before the fact? 'Irresponsible", this is about making somebody responsible by asserting the residents were "irresponsible" whether they were or not and if the town passes the buck the only smart thing to do is to fight the charge diligently and pass it back. If this author is one of the people charged he shouldn't make statements in public because they could be used against him in court, and that's for real not Law and Order talk. He admits his guilt on paper here for the most part.